LEMA NEWS CENTER

News & Blog

News Center

Halogen-Free Switch Declarations: Define Scope Before Accepting the Claim
Blog LEMA Electric

Halogen-Free Switch Declarations: Define Scope Before Accepting the Claim

A halogen-free switch declaration needs an agreed definition, material boundary and evidence basis before it can support purchasing acceptance. The phrase alone does not identify which substances were considered, which parts were included or how the conclusion was established. For the LEMA KW7 family, request information for the complete ordered configuration and the customer's actual requirement. This article does not claim that a KW7 variant is halogen free or supply a universal numerical threshold. It explains how to turn an ambiguous environmental request into a specific, reviewable evidence record. Define the term before asking for compliance Different documents and product sectors can use halogen-content terminology within different scopes. A procurement statement should therefore name the required definition and applicable document instead of relying on a familiar phrase. The IEC Guide 122 publication addresses consistent terminology related to halogen content in IEC standards. Its existence is a reason to clarify scope, not permission to assign one threshold to every electrical component. Ask the customer whether the requirement concerns the complete switch, particular homogeneous materials, added cable or another defined boundary. Identify which elements or substance groups are covered by the requested claim and how the acceptance criteria are expressed. If the requirement comes from an internal purchasing specification, retain its revision and any customer interpretation that affects the scope. Do not copy a threshold from a printed-circuit-board material standard into an unrelated switch request without an applicable basis. A rule can be valid for its stated subject while failing to answer a different procurement question. Have the responsible customer or equipment reviewer resolve the intended definition before asking a supplier to sign a broad statement. Intact KW7 housing on a cream...

Read More
Power Inlet CTI: Match Tracking Evidence to the Actual Insulating Material
Blog LEMA Electric

Power Inlet CTI: Match Tracking Evidence to the Actual Insulating Material

Power inlet comparative tracking index, or CTI, is evidence about the surface-tracking behavior of an insulating material under a specified test. It is not the inlet's working-voltage rating, a flame class or a universal creepage distance. Match the material record to the exact molded part, then use the applicable equipment requirements for the insulation assessment. For the LEMA IPZ family, this means requesting a documented connection between the ordered component and its actual insulating material. This guide supplies no CTI value, material group or approved spacing for an unidentified IPZ version. Understand the question CTI is intended to answer Insulating surfaces can be exposed to electrical stress and contamination under defined conditions. CTI provides a comparative material property determined by its test method. The result belongs to the evaluated material and its documented conditions. It should not be treated as a complete prediction of every surface or every installation in which that material might later appear. The UL plastics testing overview identifies electrical tracking among material-evaluation questions and references related procedures. The IEC insulation coordination publication covers clearances, creepage and solid-insulation criteria within its scope. Together these sources explain why material evidence and equipment insulation assessment are connected but remain separate tasks. Start an inquiry by asking what conclusion the equipment team needs. If the issue is an unknown resin grade, measuring an external dimension will not answer it. If the issue is a finished-assembly path, a material index alone will not close it. Naming the missing input prevents a document collection exercise from being mistaken for an engineering acceptance decision. IPZ-4 male inlet on a dark desk beside separate tools. Product-reference illustration; not a certification, laboratory result or approved...

Read More
Power Inlet Glow-Wire Evidence: Separate Material and End-Product Tests
Blog LEMA Electric

Power Inlet Glow-Wire Evidence: Separate Material and End-Product Tests

Power inlet glow-wire evidence must identify whether the result concerns a material specimen or the finished component under a defined test. GWFI, GWIT and glow-wire end-product testing answer related but different questions. A resin result or a UL 94 flame class cannot automatically be relabeled as an inlet's end-product glow-wire approval. For the LEMA IPZ family, request the exact version, material identity and applicable test documentation before making a procurement claim. This guide explains the evidence boundary; it assigns no glow-wire temperature, pass result or equipment approval to a photographed IPZ inlet. Identify the requirement before requesting a number Buyers sometimes ask for a glow-wire temperature without stating the equipment, standard or test type. That can produce a technically accurate supplier answer that addresses the wrong question. Begin with the end-product requirement and the exact component role. The responsible equipment reviewer should determine which evidence is applicable and whether further assessment is required. The UL electric ignition source overview distinguishes glow-wire end-product testing from material flammability and ignition-temperature evaluations. The UL plastics standards overview places these methods within the wider plastics-evaluation framework. These sources support a comparison of test identities; they do not provide a result for an IPZ housing or an exemption for a particular machine. Write the required evidence in the purchase specification using the applicable method and document reference. If the customer's requirement is unclear, resolve it before selecting a favorable number from a resin record. A reply saying “our plastic is flame retardant” does not identify the method, specimen conditions or finished-part boundary needed for an informed decision. Three male blades and mounting flange of an IPZ-4 inlet. Product-reference illustration; not a certification, laboratory result or...

Read More
Micro Switch Sulfur Corrosion: Investigate Contact Exposure Evidence
Blog LEMA Electric

Micro Switch Sulfur Corrosion: Investigate Contact Exposure Evidence

Micro switch sulfur corrosion should be investigated as a possible environmental mechanism, not diagnosed from contact intermittence alone. Establish the actual contact construction, identify plausible sulfur-bearing exposure and compare failed samples with controlled evidence before assigning a cause. For the LEMA KW7 family, obtain the exact variant's material and environmental information. This article does not claim that every KW7 contact contains silver, that a particular unit is sulfur damaged or that an enclosure eliminates corrosive gases. The goal is an evidence-based investigation that separates exposure, material response and the observed electrical fault. Start with a defined symptom and sample history Intermittent operation can arise from several sources: motion, a connection, contact behavior, wiring or the measurement system. Record what the machine did, the contact state expected and how the event was observed. Preserve timestamps and operating conditions where practical. An environmental hypothesis becomes more useful when it can be compared against repeatable observations rather than a general report that the switch is unreliable. Keep failed samples with their lot identity, location and handling history. Avoid cleaning, scraping or repeatedly cycling them before deciding what evidence is needed. Such actions can change the surface or the electrical behavior under investigation. Safe isolation and qualified handling remain necessary; preserving evidence does not mean leaving faulty equipment in operation. Use the micro switch failure investigation guide to organize alternative explanations. The present article focuses on sulfur-related exposure rather than replacing that wider diagnosis. A credible conclusion should explain why the observed evidence supports this mechanism and why the most plausible competing explanations have been considered. Intact KW7 switch on a dark blue background with no simulated corrosion. Product-reference illustration; not a certification, laboratory...

Read More
Micro Switch Accelerated Life Testing: Check the Model Before Extrapolation
Blog LEMA Electric

Micro Switch Accelerated Life Testing: Check the Model Before Extrapolation

Micro switch accelerated life testing can shorten the time needed to investigate a failure mechanism, but it cannot turn an arbitrary harsh test into a credible service-life prediction. Define the intended use, identify the mechanism being accelerated and justify the relationship between test stress and service conditions before extrapolating. For the LEMA KW7 series, request evidence for the exact variant and duty. No acceleration factor, field reliability or guaranteed lifetime is assigned here. A switch that survives rapid unloaded cycling has answered a different question from a loaded switch tested under a justified acceleration model. Decide what decision the test must support Begin with the engineering decision. A team may want to compare design variants, discover weak construction, establish a qualification result or estimate life under a specified duty. These are different objectives. A test designed to expose weaknesses can be useful without supporting a numerical life prediction. Name the objective before ordering fixtures or selecting an elevated stress. The NIST accelerated life test guidance describes planning around stress levels, samples, observation time and models. The NASA accelerated testing knowledge base discusses accelerated exposure as a way to reveal failures sooner. These are general reliability resources. Neither provides a validated model or a qualified test profile for a particular LEMA switch. Write the proposed conclusion in advance. “Variant A showed fewer failures under this test” is narrower than “Variant A will last a specified number of years in every machine.” The second statement requires a chain of assumptions and evidence that the first does not. Making the intended conclusion explicit helps prevent a useful development experiment from being promoted into an unsupported sales claim. KW7 roller-lever switch beside a closed...

Read More
Safety Foot Switch With Guard: Selection and Placement
Blog LEMA Electric

Safety Foot Switch With Guard: Selection and Placement

A safety foot switch is not defined by a yellow hood or a warning symbol. A guarded foot control can reduce unintended pedal activation, but safe machine operation depends on the whole system: the machine's hazards, point-of-operation safeguarding, control logic, fault response, mounting position, operator access, and validation. For a buyer comparing guarded pedals, first specify what accidental actuation the cover must resist and what intentional foot movement it must allow. Then confirm the exact pedal's mechanical and electrical details and have the machine safety function assessed by a qualified person. This guide uses LEMA's real guarded LF-series foot-switch construction as a selection example without claiming an unverified safety certification. Original LEMA LF-62 product-and-dimension image. The visible yellow hood covers two gray pedals; it is a physical guard feature, not evidence of a certified safety function. What a guarded foot switch does A foot switch lets an operator initiate or control a machine function while keeping the hands free. A protective hood or shroud can make it harder for a falling object, another person's step, or an unintended sideways movement to press the pedal. The shape, opening, side walls, and location matter: a cover that looks substantial in a catalog may still allow an object to enter from the front or a shoe to reach the pedal unintentionally. The real risk must be tested at the intended installation. For mechanical power presses, the US OSHA foot-control guidance warns that foot controls leave the operator's hands free and do not themselves separate hands from the point of operation. It also identifies inadvertent pedal activation as a hazard and calls for guarding and other safeguards in relevant press applications. That is a...

Read More
6-Pin Toggle Switch Wiring: Verify a DPDT Terminal Layout
Blog LEMA Electric

6-Pin Toggle Switch Wiring: Verify a DPDT Terminal Layout

6-pin toggle switch wiring usually refers to a double-pole, double-throw (DPDT) switch: two independent changeover contact sets operated by one handle. Each pole has a common and two possible throws, giving six external terminals. Do not wire a switch from the pin count or a generic photograph alone. Identify the exact model and its ON-ON, ON-OFF-ON, momentary, or other action; then test the de-energized terminals for continuity in every handle position. Only after that map should a qualified person connect a circuit that fits the switch's ratings and the equipment's protection design. This guide focuses on terminal identification and verification, not an untested universal pinout. Original LEMA LT2220C product photo. Six flat terminals can be inspected from this angle; their functional mapping must still be verified from the exact drawing and continuity test. What six terminals mean—and what they do not A DPDT toggle is functionally two SPDT changeover contacts moved together. Pole A and pole B are electrically separate until an external circuit connects them. Each pole has a common terminal that connects to one throw in one position and the other throw in the opposite position. The switch can route two independent signals, or be arranged for another appropriate application after the circuit designer verifies ratings and fault behavior. Six terminals do not reveal which physical lug is common on a particular model, and they do not reveal whether the center position is OFF. The City Tech electronics lab manual treats a DPDT as a two-state input and explicitly tells students to check continuity because a real switch can differ from the illustrated pattern. A South African Department of Basic Education learner book explains a DPDT as two...

Read More
Micro Switch Electrical Life vs Mechanical Life: What the Ratings Mean
Blog LEMA Electric

Micro Switch Electrical Life vs Mechanical Life: What the Ratings Mean

Micro switch electrical life vs mechanical life compares two different endurance tests. Mechanical life counts operations at a stated speed and travel without an energized contact load. Electrical life counts operations while the contacts switch a specified voltage, current, and load type. The figures are not interchangeable, and neither is a calendar-life promise for a finished machine. A buyer should ask for the exact model's test conditions, then compare them with the machine's real actuation rate, overtravel, inrush, duty cycle, environment, and acceptable failure risk. This guide explains how to read those figures without inventing a life rating for a LEMA part that has not been tested in your assembly. Original LEMA KW12-series product photo. The plunger and lever affect how the switch is operated; the image itself does not establish a cycle-life rating. What is mechanical life? Mechanical life, also called mechanical durability, describes the number of full switch operations achieved under a stated mechanical test, normally with the contact circuit not energized. An operation means the actuator is moved through its specified operating and release sequence, not merely touched. The test must define operation frequency, stroke or overtravel, operating speed, mounting, and the criterion used to call the switch failed. A mechanism can lose its snap action, spring force, return behavior, or dimensional stability even if no electrical load is switched. The IEC 61020-1 publication description identifies electromechanical switches as devices that change an electrical connection through mechanical contact motion and says the generic specification addresses terminology and test methods. That is a useful framework, not evidence that any particular KW12 model meets a specific endurance value. For the mechanical side of a purchased model, request the manufacturer's...

Read More
Mechanical Limit Switch vs Proximity Sensor: Selection Guide
Blog LEMA Electric

Mechanical Limit Switch vs Proximity Sensor: Selection Guide

Mechanical limit switch vs proximity sensor is a choice between detecting a position through physical contact and detecting a target without touching it. A mechanical limit switch changes its electrical contacts when a machine part moves its actuator. A proximity sensor detects a target within its sensing field and provides an electronic output. Neither is universally more accurate, rugged, or safe. The correct choice depends on target material, travel and alignment, switching frequency, environment, control-system input, maintenance access, and the consequence of a missed or false signal. This guide compares those decisions for equipment designers and OEM buyers without assuming that a product photo proves an application rating. LEMA HL-series product image: two mechanical actuator styles, not proximity sensors. Compare the exact model drawing before selecting a mounting position. What each device actually detects A mechanical limit switch reports that its actuator has moved far enough to transfer its contacts. The machine cam, door, carriage, or other moving part must make contact with the lever, roller, or plunger. The switch does not directly measure the absolute position of the whole machine; it reports one defined state at the switch mounting location. Its operating and release positions, pretravel, overtravel, and approach direction all matter. A cam can touch the actuator yet fail to move it enough to change state. “Proximity sensor” covers several technologies, not one interchangeable part. An inductive sensor responds to a suitable metal target through an electromagnetic field; a capacitive, magnetic, or photoelectric device uses a different physical principle and has different target and environmental limitations. The Worcester Polytechnic Institute robotics documentation distinguishes mechanical and inductive proximity switches, while a Gulf Coast State College PLC lab explains that...

Read More
How to Wire a Limit Switch to a PLC Input
Blog LEMA Electric

How to Wire a Limit Switch to a PLC Input

To wire a mechanical limit switch to a PLC input, first read the PLC module’s input-voltage and common-terminal diagram, then identify the switch’s COM, NO and NC terminals with a meter. A dry contact does not create a voltage: it only opens or closes a path from the correct supply rail to the input. For a typical 24 V DC sinking input, the common is connected to 0 V and the limit-switch contact switches +24 V to the input. For a sourcing input, the polarity is reversed. The exact module manual—not a generic color code—decides the connection. This guide covers a standard position-indication input. A single ordinary limit switch wired to a standard PLC input is not, by itself, a safety-rated emergency-stop or guard-monitoring circuit. Use the machine risk assessment and the approved safety design for those functions. Start with the complete input circuit A PLC input reports ON only when current flows through its sensing circuit. The mechanical switch is one element in that loop. Before landing a wire, record the input module model, permitted input voltage, input type, common grouping, power-supply polarity and channel number. The terms sinking and sourcing describe the current path in a DC circuit; they are not interchangeable labels for every input. AutomationDirect’s input-module explanation shows why a contact between supply positive and the input works when the module’s common returns to supply negative. The actual PLC module wiring manual remains the authority for a particular installation. Item to verifyWhy it mattersWhere to checkRated input voltage and thresholdPrevents a false OFF indication or module damagePLC input datasheetInput common polarity and groupingDetermines the current path for every channel sharing the commonModule terminal diagramSwitch contact identityCOM–NO...

Read More
Micro Switch Contact Resistance: Causes, Testing and Limits
Blog LEMA Electric

Micro Switch Contact Resistance: Causes, Testing and Limits

Micro switch contact resistance is the resistance through the closed contact path, measured between the relevant terminals while the actuator holds the contact closed. A higher or unstable reading can indicate contamination, poor terminal connections, contact wear, insufficient contact force or a measurement error. The correct limit is not a universal number: use the specification for the exact switch model and its stated test conditions. A continuity beep only shows that a circuit is connected; it does not prove that a low-level signal will remain reliable over many cycles. This guide separates the switch’s internal contact from cable and probe resistance, explains when a two-wire check is enough, and shows how to compare repeated measurements without inventing a pass/fail threshold. It is intended for OEM and maintenance decisions on unpowered, isolated switches—not for resistance testing on a live circuit. What the measured value actually includes With a conventional two-lead digital multimeter, the display includes the switch contact path plus the meter leads, probe-to-terminal interfaces, and any connected cable or parallel circuit. If the switch is still wired into a machine, other paths through a PLC input, indicator or suppression component can distort the result. Disconnect and isolate the device according to the machine procedure before measuring resistance. Short the meter probes together and note the baseline; a high or changing baseline means the test setup needs attention before judging the switch. A separate issue is contact bounce: brief opening and reclosing around actuation. Bounce is a time-domain behavior, not a steady-state ohms value. Likewise, an electrical life rating is a cycle-test result under specified load conditions, not a statement that every switch will fail at a particular resistance after a...

Read More
IEC C14 Inlet With Fuse and Switch: Wiring Guide
Blog LEMA Electric

IEC C14 Inlet With Fuse and Switch: Wiring Guide

C14 inlet with fuse and switch wiring should be selected by matching the electrical function, mechanical interface, environment, and verification plan—not by copying a generic diagram or choosing from appearance alone. A fused, switched C14 inlet combines three functions in one assembly: equipment connection, overcurrent protection, and manual switching. Terminal layout and fuse topology vary. Protective earth must never be routed through the switch or fuse, and the finished design requires review against its schematic and applicable equipment standard. This guide gives engineers and OEM buyers a practical way to define the requirement, compare samples, and avoid a part that works on the bench but fails after installation. Application-focused view using the matching LEMA product. What the term means in this application A fused, switched C14 inlet combines three functions in one assembly: equipment connection, overcurrent protection, and manual switching. Terminal layout and fuse topology vary. Protective earth must never be routed through the switch or fuse, and the finished design requires review against its schematic and applicable equipment standard. The first job is to separate the switch's name from its required behavior. Product names are often shortened for search or purchasing, while an engineering drawing defines the contact state, terminal numbering, operating point, allowable travel, mounting reference, and ratings. If those details are missing, two parts with similar names may behave differently. Write the control requirement as a short sequence: the condition before actuation, the physical action that causes actuation, the electrical state after actuation, and the condition that resets it. This sequence prevents confusion between mechanical action and contact logic. It also gives the controls engineer, mechanical designer, buyer, and supplier one shared description to review. Do not...

Read More