News & Blog

Blog Oct 27, 2026 LEMA Electric

Micro Switch Altitude Derating: Separate Electrical and Thermal Limits

Micro switch altitude derating requires separate reviews of insulation, contact switching and heat in the installed equipment. A current and voltage marking alone does not establish suitability at a mountain site or in a reduced-pressure enclosure. Ask the supplier for the exact variant's environmental limits, then assess the assembly under its applicable equipment standard. Do not borrow a correction factor from a motor, breaker or unrelated switch. For the LEMA KW7 series, this article provides an application-review workflow; it does not assign a new altitude rating or establish that any particular version has passed reduced-pressure testing. Why altitude belongs in the equipment specification A machine originally built for a low-elevation factory may later be ordered for a mountain installation. Its drawing can remain identical while the environment changes. Altitude affects atmospheric conditions, and pressure matters when reviewing electrical paths through air. The local air temperature, enclosure ventilation and operating load also deserve attention. These influences must be described together rather than compressed into a single unexplained percentage. The NASA atmosphere model illustrates how pressure, temperature and density vary with height in a simplified atmosphere. It explains the physical background, not the rating of an electrical component. Actual equipment can have a different internal temperature or pressure from the surrounding weather. Record whether the switch is inside an unpressurized cabinet, a controlled enclosure or another defined environment before choosing the assessment conditions. An altitude requirement should travel with the purchase specification. If it appears only in a late installation email, the component supplier may never have considered it. The practical first step is to add the maximum intended operating elevation, the relevant pressure conditions where known, and the enclosure arrangement to...

Blog Oct 26, 2026 LEMA Electric

Switch Material Declarations: Request Usable IEC 62474 Data

A switch material declaration prepared for an IEC 62474 request needs a defined product identity, an agreed reporting scope and usable substance information. A generic statement that a switch is environmentally compliant may not contain the data a customer needs to process. Before asking the supplier to complete a file, specify the required format and edition, the reference-list version, the ordered configuration and the expected declaration type. Then check both the file's structure and the meaning of its contents. Passing a format check does not establish that the material information is complete or correct. The LEMA KW7 micro switch is the product example for this purchasing workflow. The article does not claim that an IEC 62474 XML declaration already exists for every KW7 option. Request the available data for the exact part, identify any missing fields and agree how they will be resolved. Product photographs help identify the item but cannot establish its substance composition. Define the receiving system before creating another spreadsheet Begin with the customer's actual request. Ask whether it needs an IEC 62474 declaration, an IPC-1752 format or a customer-specific worksheet. Record the accepted revision or schema version and the validation method. Sending a large amount of information in an incompatible format can leave both parties repeating work while the original request remains unanswered. IEC's material-declaration overview describes a common format for reporting and exchanging material and substance information. It distinguishes compliance and composition declarations within its described framework. Use the edition and requirements agreed for your request rather than assuming that the title of a standard alone defines every field, reporting depth or customer acceptance rule. Separate a statement from a structured declaration A short supplier...

Blog Oct 26, 2026 LEMA Electric

Limit Switch Cable Shielding: Diagnose PLC Noise Before Rewiring

Limit switch cable shielding can help control interference, but it should follow a diagnosis of the complete switch-to-controller circuit. A false PLC transition may come from contact bounce, unstable actuation, a loose connection, incorrect input logic or electrical noise coupled into the cable. Identify the actual cause before changing shield connections. The correct cable route and termination depend on the controller instructions, the installation's bonding arrangement and the interference being addressed. There is no universal rule that every limit-switch shield must be connected at exactly one end. The LEMA LZ1 mechanical limit switch is the product example here. Its enclosure and actuator do not define the shield arrangement of an external cable or prove immunity of a complete PLC installation. The photographs show the intact switch beside separate cable-planning items, with no approved wiring arrangement implied. Use the exact switch terminal record and controller manual when preparing the circuit. Establish what the PLC is actually seeing Write down the unwanted event precisely. Note whether it occurs during switch actuation, while the mechanism is stationary, when a motor starts or during another machine action. Distinguish the PLC's raw input indication from a program condition or a displayed alarm. These observations help determine whether the problem belongs to the physical signal path or to the way the signal is interpreted. Start with the limit switch PLC wiring guide to confirm the intended contact path and input arrangement. Check the actual terminal identities, supply reference and selected input channel against the drawing. A wiring error should not be hidden by adding shielding or software delays. Record the original configuration so any later change can be assessed against a known starting point. Separate mechanical...

Blog Oct 26, 2026 LEMA Electric

UL 94 for Power Inlets: Verify the Plastic Rating and Its Limits

UL 94 flammability evidence for a power inlet describes the behavior of a specified plastic material under defined test conditions. It does not, by itself, establish the inlet's current rating, operating temperature, insulation performance or approval of the finished equipment. When an OEM specification calls for a particular flame classification, connect that requirement to the actual resin grade, color, thickness and component configuration being supplied. A generic claim that the inlet uses flame-retardant plastic leaves important questions unanswered. This guide uses the LEMA IPZ power socket series as a product example. Its visible black housing establishes neither a resin identity nor a UL 94 classification. The illustrations follow the screw-mount IPZ-4 form shown in the product reference; they are not photographs of a flammability test. Ask LEMA for the material and approval records applicable to the exact ordered configuration before adding a flame-class claim to an equipment specification. Define which part needs the material evidence A power inlet can contain several nonmetallic parts with different functions. Identify the housing, any separate carrier and other relevant insulating parts on the actual construction record. Ask which material specification applies to each part being reviewed. Do not assume that one resin statement covers every plastic item in a wider family or an attached accessory. This identification step also prevents a common document mix-up: a supplier may provide a valid material record for a nearby component rather than the part actually ordered. Tie the response to the manufacturer's complete part number and drawing revision. If the construction is not documented at the level you need, make that a focused supplier question instead of filling the gap with an assumption about appearance. Read UL 94...

Blog Oct 25, 2026 LEMA Electric

IP67 vs NEMA 4 Limit Switches: Compare Evidence Before Substitution

IP67 vs NEMA 4 limit switch specifications cannot be resolved by treating the two labels as equivalent. They belong to different enclosure classification systems and address different sets of conditions. Identify the actual exposure, check the scope of the rating for the ordered switch, and review the complete installed arrangement. If a purchase specification requires NEMA Type 4, an IP67 statement alone is not enough to approve a substitution. Ask for evidence that answers the original requirement, or obtain a documented engineering decision to revise the requirement. The LEMA LZ1 limit switch is the mechanical product illustrated here. Its current product page states IP66; this article does not relabel it IP67, NEMA Type 4 or Type 4X. The example shows why a buyer needs to read the actual model record instead of transferring a rating from a related family or a similar-looking enclosure. Identify which protection question you are asking Start with the machine location and operating process. Describe dust, rain, spray, cleaning, occasional immersion and any chemical exposure separately. Also record where the switch is mounted and whether its cable entry faces a likely water path. A single word such as waterproof does not communicate these conditions well enough for a supplier to assess the correct configuration. IEC 60529 defines the IP classification framework for enclosure protection. Use the applicable standard and product evidence to interpret a claimed code. An immersion-related designation does not automatically answer every question about water jets, cleaning chemicals, corrosion or a machine's maintenance procedure. Those need their own relevant requirements and evidence. Understand why a conversion chart is only a starting point NEMA's enclosure-type guide expressly limits the direction in which its comparison table...

Blog Oct 25, 2026 LEMA Electric

RoHS and REACH for Switches: Check Supplier Compliance Evidence

RoHS and REACH compliance for switches should be reviewed as two separate substance-management questions. A RoHS statement does not automatically answer every REACH question, and an electrical safety approval does not replace either review. For an OEM purchase, define the destination market, the equipment application, the exact switch configuration and the evidence date. Then ask the supplier for statements that identify their scope and supporting basis. A useful response explains which ordered parts are covered and which questions still require assessment by the equipment manufacturer or importer. The LEMA KW7 micro switch is the product example in this guide. The housing, metal terminals and actuator can help identify a sample, but appearance cannot reveal its material composition or establish regulatory compliance. Request current evidence for the exact order code. This article does not declare a particular KW7 configuration RoHS compliant, REACH compliant or free of any named substance without the relevant supplier documentation. Begin with the question the document must answer A buyer often receives a single green-compliance file during quotation. Before accepting it, write down what your organization needs to decide. Is the request about restricted substances in equipment, information on substances present in supplied articles, a customer declaration format, or all of these? Assign the review to someone who understands the applicable market and product scope. The European Commission's RoHS overview describes restrictions on hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. Its scope and exemptions need to be considered for the actual application. A component supplier's response supports the equipment assessment; it should not be presented as a universal approval for every finished product into which the switch might be installed. Keep RoHS and REACH evidence separate The...

Blog Oct 25, 2026 LEMA Electric

UL Listed vs UL Recognized Switches: Verify the Right Approval

UL Listed vs UL Recognized switches is a question about the scope of the approval, not simply which logo looks more reassuring. For an OEM buying a switch to build into equipment, confirm the exact component identity, the certification category, the covered electrical duty and any conditions attached to its use. A recognized component can be appropriate for an evaluated assembly, while a listing on another product does not approve every possible installation. Start with the evidence for the ordered variant, then have the equipment approval reviewed against the intended application. This guide addresses purchasing and engineering document review. The LEMA KW7 micro switch is the physical product example. Its catalogue mentions several approvals across the series; that statement is a reason to request the applicable records, rather than proof that every combination of terminals, lever, rating and operating force has identical coverage. No certification file number or unrestricted approval is inferred from the illustrations in this article. Separate the component decision from the equipment decision A switch supplier and an equipment manufacturer answer related but different questions. The supplier identifies what was manufactured and provides the documentation that applies to it. The equipment manufacturer checks whether that part fits the design, the environment and the applicable equipment evaluation. A purchasing release should connect those two decisions without treating one as a substitute for the other. UL Solutions explains component recognition as a program for parts and subassemblies used in larger certified products. Such parts have conditions of acceptability. In practical review, ask what those conditions require for the particular switch and how the equipment drawing satisfies them. Keep this evidence with the component record so a later engineer can...

Blog Oct 24, 2026 LEMA Electric

Micro Switch Temperature Rise Test: Validate the Loaded Assembly

A micro switch temperature rise test evaluates heating in a defined loaded assembly relative to a defined ambient reference. It needs more than a warm-to-the-touch judgment or a single resistance reading. Establish the exact switch, terminal connection, conductor, enclosure, current duty and acceptance basis before testing. Record temperature over time until the method's stabilization requirement is met, then compare both temperature rise and absolute temperature with the applicable limits. This guide helps OEM buyers prepare a representative test request without inventing a universal temperature limit for every micro switch. Start with the decision the test must support State whether the work is a development comparison, investigation of a field complaint, supplier qualification or a formal compliance evaluation. These purposes can require different specimens, methods and reports. A quick bench comparison can identify a suspicious connection, but it cannot automatically replace a prescribed product or equipment test. Agree who owns the test specification and who will approve the result. Identify the full switch code and drawing revision. Add terminal type, mating connector, conductor material and size, connection process and any mounting hardware that influences the installation. A result obtained with one connection cannot simply be assigned to another arrangement. The heat source might be a contact path, a loose connector, a conductor or an external component near the switch. The KW7 series page is a starting point for an inquiry about a physical switch family. The KW7 selection guide organizes the wider component review. Request the exact supported variant data and any applicable test conditions from Lemaele. Do not turn a family-level current marking or operating ambient statement into an assumed temperature-rise limit. The complete application must remain within the relevant...

Blog Oct 24, 2026 LEMA Electric

Micro Switch Parallel Contacts: Why Current Ratings Do Not Add

Micro switch parallel contacts should not be used to add current ratings unless the manufacturer explicitly supports the arrangement and its conditions. Two contacts do not necessarily close together, share current equally or open together. The first contact to close and the last to open may face a different duty from the steady parallel combination. For an OEM build, define the purpose of paralleling, examine each credible contact state and select a supported switching arrangement instead of treating two catalog ampere values as arithmetic capacity. Clarify the reason for a parallel path A proposal to connect contacts in parallel can start with several different problems: insufficient current capacity, a desire to keep a circuit available, or an attempt to reduce resistance. These are separate objectives. Write down the actual requirement before changing the harness. A circuit that remains energized after one contact sticks may satisfy an availability objective while violating the intended stop behavior. Draw every contact, common terminal and wire connection. Identify whether there are two separate switches, two independent poles in one device, or the NO and NC terminals of an SPDT mechanism. Those arrangements cannot be treated as equivalent. In particular, the two throws of an SPDT switch are alternate destinations; joining them does not create two independently specified simultaneous closed poles. Use the micro switch wiring guide to establish the normal terminal logic before discussing a changed topology. Confirm the actual variant and diagram from the supplier. The KW7 family provides a physical product reference, but its appearance does not establish pole independence, synchronized operation or permission to parallel contacts for a higher load. Close view of two separate KW7 specimens with unconnected terminals. Product-reference illustration;...

Blog Oct 24, 2026 LEMA Electric

Micro Switch Capacitive Loads: Review Inrush Before Selecting Contacts

A micro switch capacitive load needs a closing-current review, even when its steady running current is small. Charging the load's input capacitance can create a short current pulse that a normal running-current measurement misses. Select contacts against the exact voltage, circuit, switching duty and supported load evidence; do not assume a resistive-load marking also approves an electronic power input. This guide explains how an OEM can describe that pulse, examine practical mitigation options and prepare a useful supplier review without inventing a universal capacitive-load rating. Identify what the switch actually energizes Begin with the equipment schematic and the real load, rather than the name on the finished appliance. A switch that enables a logic input sees a different circuit from a switch that connects power to an electronic controller. Both assemblies may draw the same running current elsewhere in the machine. Trace the current through the contact during closing, normal operation and opening, including alternative supply paths and any input filtering. List the supply voltage range, whether the switched path is AC or DC, the input capacitance where known, and the load manufacturer's startup information. Include power-supply current limiting and cable resistance. If the load is a purchased module, ask its manufacturer for the relevant input behavior rather than estimating everything from the nameplate wattage. A switching power supply can present a more complicated input than a single ideal capacitor. The KW7 series product page is a starting point for identifying the physical switch family. Ask Lemaele to confirm the complete variant, terminal arrangement and supported electrical duty for your circuit. A family photograph or a headline current value does not establish a capacitive switching capability. Retain the exact drawing...

Blog Oct 23, 2026 LEMA Electric

Micro Switch Tolerance Stack-Up: Check the Assembly Travel Window

A micro switch tolerance stack-up checks whether the assembled mechanism will operate the switch and let it return across the dimensional variation allowed by the design. Start from a common reference and track the dimensions between the switch mounting location and the moving target. Compare the resulting actuator position with the exact variant's supported operating, travel and return requirements. Nominal alignment is only one case. An assembly can work at the center of its dimensions while another permitted combination fails to operate or imposes excessive travel. Define the two states the mechanism must achieve Write down the required mechanical and electrical conditions in both the target-present and target-withdrawn states. The required event may be a change in one contact path, but the assembly also needs a supported mechanical position and an unobstructed return path. Identify which machine position establishes each state and what controls that position. A loosely described requirement such as 'press the switch fully' leaves both the actuation boundary and maximum imposed movement undefined. Use the KW7 product family only as the starting point for obtaining the exact component documents. Confirm the complete actuator variant, mounting features, contact arrangement and drawing revision. The travel definitions article explains why pretravel, overtravel and differential travel address different boundaries. Do not replace their actual specified values with dimensions estimated from a photograph. If a required boundary is unavailable, identify that missing evidence before approving the assembly window. KW7 switch beside two separate target-height specimens and disconnected caliper. Product-reference illustration; separate objects are not an approved installation or measured test result. Draw one dimensional chain from a common reference Choose a reference that connects the switch mount and the target position in...

Blog Oct 23, 2026 LEMA Electric

Micro Switch Test Fixture: Separate Component Behavior from Setup Error

A micro switch test fixture should locate the component consistently, apply the intended actuator motion and observe the electrical event without adding uncontrolled force, movement or circuit effects. Define the measurement before building the fixture: continuity, operating position, release position and force are different questions. Use the exact switch drawing and supported conditions to establish references and limits. A fixture can produce repeatable numbers that are still wrong if it measures from the wrong surface, bends the lever or interprets contact bounce as several independent operations. Start with the decision the fixture must support An incoming continuity check asks whether specified terminals change state under defined movement. A travel measurement asks where a defined event occurs relative to a mechanical reference. A force measurement adds the load path, contact point and measurement direction. Life or environmental evaluation adds further conditions and evidence. Do not combine these decisions into one unexplained green light. State what is being measured, which configuration is represented and what result will support the intended acceptance or engineering decision. The KW7 product page identifies the relevant component family, but the fixture needs the complete candidate variant and controlled documentation. A bare plunger and a roller lever do not share every mechanical reference. If a fixture accommodates multiple variants, use controlled inserts or explicit setups and record which one was used. An operator should not be able to substitute an apparently similar switch and obtain a misleading approval simply because its housing fits between the same two locating blocks. KW7 switch beside a separate straight rod and disconnected caliper. Product-reference illustration; separate objects are not an approved installation or measured test result. Establish a stable location without distorting...

News & Blog

News Center